Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Script: "Reality is a vaccum"


Waste in Space: “Reality is a vacuum”

The Drama’s Personnel:
-          Carlos—Bowl—Man with no name
-          Cat—Shadow figure
-          Broom—Herald Broom

-          Props
o   One candle
o   Projector background—Sunset—Moonrise—Zenith
o   Blue broomstick
o   A bookshelf containing Wallace Stevens: Collected Poetry and Prose, Harold Bloom’s The Anatomy of Influence, Lucretius’ Of the Nature of Things, Solaris, etc…
o   Bowl—Bleak crown
o   Costumes
§  Carlos’ costume—dressed as a peasant
§  Cat—Cat mask
§  Broom—in all-black stage-techie costume, carrying blue broom

Cited: Works of Wallace Stevens
o   Carlos Amongst the Candles, 615
o   The House Was Quiet and the World Was Calm, 311
o   Crude Foyer, 270
o   The Bowl, Cat, and Broomstick, 621
o   Notes Towards A Supreme Fiction, 329
o   Of Modern Poetry, 218
o   Man Carrying Thing, 306
o   Three Men Watching a Sunset, 601
o   Adagia, 900





-          Enter Carlos who has a lengthy, quiet, and patient entrance onstage. Carlos enters stage right through the front door, lights a candle on the table, and looks around the room. He notices the shadows created by the light.
Carlos – Having lit this candle in the darkness the solitude increases and the isolation it provides is my own.
-          There’s a small ominous shadow sitting nearby the window. Carlos chases after the sneaky shadow which hides after he sees the figure’s shadow in the dark)
Carlos – Hey, come out! You…thing! That I’ve by now frightened…Why don’t you just think, man? Gah! Darned scaredy cat. Might it have been a figment of my imagination?
-          The shadow ceases to show itself so Carlos concedes his search, and then he notices more things around the room.

Carlos – A blue broom. A bowl. Ah…
What’s on this thing? (referring to bookshelf, Carlos investigates the books on the bookshelf)
Ah, and on this thing? (referring to the cover of the book Carlos picks up)
What’s in this thing? (referring to the contents inside the book Carlos has in his hands)
Ah, and in this thing? (referring to the single book on the table, open to page 311,
“The House was Quiet and the world was calm”.)
Ah…The house was quiet and the world was calm.
The reader became the book; and summer night
Was like the conscious being of the book.
The house was quiet and the world was calm.
The words were spoken as if there was no book,
Except that the reader leaned above the page,
Wanted to lean, wanted much to be
The scholar to whom his book is true, to whom
The summer night is like a perfection of thought.
The house was quiet because it had to be.
The quiet was part of the meaning, part of the mind:
The access of perfection to the page.
And the world was calm. The truth in a calm world,
In which there is no other meaning, itself
Is calm, itself is summer and night, itself
Is the reader leaning late and reading there.
-          Carlos picks up the book, closes it, and looks at its blank, blue cover. Carlos then opens the book to a different random page. The books pages fall upon Crude Foyer, page 270. Carlos’ lines start the poem.
Carlos – Crude Foyer:
Thought is false happiness: the idea
That merely by thinking one can,
Or may, penetrate, not may,
But can, that one is sure to be able—
That there lies at the end of thought
A foyer of the spirit in a landscape
Of the mind, in which we sit
And wear humanity's bleak crown;
-          Carlos pauses, sees a round bowl on the ground which could resemble a crown, makes sure nobody is watching him, and places the bowl on his head as it were a crown.
Carlos - In which we read the critique of paradise
And say it is the work of a comedian,
-          Carlos walks over towards a blue broom, then around the room and looks upon the contents of the bookshelf. He curiously looks for a brief time, brings a book or two from off the shelf back to the table, and continues the poem standing up…
Carlos - this critique
In which we sit and breathe
An innocence of an absolute…false happiness…
-          Carlos gets emotional flipping the pages of the book. [Something absolute is inadequate, being subject to criticism. Absolution is innocent and therefore fallacious, as is all literature.] Cat is looking on, concealed by the podium, and sees Carlos’ anger and page turning act. Carlos leaves the table, unhappily pacing around the podium area, then stops to open the “blinds” to find a sunset shining in the sky (or: moon gleaming amongst the auroras), finally stops and looks out the window. Cat emerges, sits down at the table leaning over the book, finds the same page that Carlos was reading, and picks up where Carlos left the poem off (or: Cat cannot find the page and thus turns to a random page and begins reading). Carlos can neither hear nor see Cat because it’s “too dark and too quiet.”

Cat - …false happiness…
Since we know that we use
Only the eye as faculty, that the mind
Is the eye, and that this landscape of the mind
Is a landscape only of the eyes; and that
We are ignorant men incapable
Of the least, minor, vital metaphor, content,
At last, there, when it turns out to be here.
-          After finishing Crude Foyer, 270, Cat opens to a random page containing Notes Towards a Supreme Fiction, page 329, and begins to recite out of the book.


Cat – It Must be Abstract: I
Begin, ephebe, by perceiving the idea
Of this invention, this invented world,
The inconceivable idea of the sun.
You must become an ignorant man again
And see the sun again with an ignorant eye
And see it clearly in the idea of it.
AY, YES! That’s it! Don’t you see? To become an ignorant man is to see the world as an invention, apprehended through our conceptions or rather constant conception of it. It’s our own invention, and thus it’s a fiction, OUR fiction. Reality is the idea of the sun, an idea…OF COURSE! How can we perceive reality beyond our creation of it, our own inventiveness, and see the world without at least one premeditated idea of it? TSK! Our reality is invented, inventing itself as we speak in the face of a believable fiction believed to be true within the context of thus truthfulness. YES! Our reality is a conception of the mind. We must become ignorant, naïve. But how-so? Imagination? Imagination is the power the enables us to perceive the normal things in the abnormal being, the opposite of chaos in chaos [or: allowing an attempt at performing a setting opposite of chaos, span in a realm delegated by chaos]. Imagination is seeing the vista and believing the ignorance of the perceiving mind, it is letting go of what is real, forgetting, looking, grasping; and then again creating. It is acceptance of such nonsense and believing therein faith’s fullness of that supreme nonsense. Forget what you know or have learned, and look through the pretend lens of ignorance; and you will see everything in the idea of it. This is what gives life to the fiction of our adapting, germinal reality. The problems of any man are the problems of the normal, and all we need to solve them in nature is to order everything the imagination has to give. And BELIEVE IT! In the service of imagination nothing can be too lavish, too sublime, or too festive. This is what our reality…our fiction…needs.

([OPTIONAL DIALOGUE INSERT] Carlos – (aside) The violet moon is the biggest island in the ocean slathering about with coral reefs into the blue. The northern aural green glittered prisms slice as serpents in the vaporous night sky abysm. The earthy sheen deflects the moonshine to my eyes through the dew’s into pupils, misprision the two as if examining the sun so blissfully with such an ignorant glean coating mine own eyes. The saying shows true, but being so I’ve either overlooked understating this so-called bliss or lost my thread too quickly missing out on it altogether…Who could I ask, what do I see; so I can get to where I’m going? The Bible? Hah! No. How about, the book! But first…)

-          Carlos begins wandering the room again seeing all the things that could give him light. There is a number of lights which he proceeds to turn on. Carlos turns on the last light he can find in the room, turns around, and notices a Cat-creature sitting at the table reading the books after having turned on all the lights. Both the Cat and Carlos are startled. The Cat accidentally bumps the book, turning to page 218 containing “Of Modern Poetry...”
Carlos – I don’t believe it!
Cat – Meow! The cat’s out of the bag!
Carlos – Whoa, hey, nay, wait, ay, hold up! What have you got there?
Cat – (startled, then looks at the book) Of Modern Poetry…
Carlos – How does it go?
-          Cat begins reading. Carlos begins pacing skeptically around the table…
Cat – The poem of the mind in the act of finding what will suffice.
It has not always had to find: the scene was set;
It repeated what was in the script. Then the theatre was changed to something else.
Its past was a souvenir. It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place.
It has to face the men of the time and to meet the women of the time.
It has to think about war and it has to find what will suffice.
It has to construct a new stage. It has to be on that stage, 
And, like an insatiable actor, slowly and with meditation, speak words that in the ear,
In the delicatest ear of the mind, repeat, exactly, that which it wants to hear,
At the sound of which, an invisible audience listens, Not to the play, but to itself,
Expressed in an emotion as of two people, as of two emotions becoming one.
The actor is a metaphysician in the dark, twanging an instrument,

Carlos – Ah, an instrument? Ah yes, this will do.

-          Carlos sees the blue broom, goes over to pick it up and play it…

Cat – Twanging a wiry string that gives sounds passing through sudden rightnesses,
Wholly containing the mind, below which it cannot descend,
Beyond which it has no will to rise. It must Be the finding of a satisfaction,
And may be of a man skating, a woman dancing, a woman combing.
The poem of the act of the mind.

Carlos – The poem must resist the intelligence almost successfully. Illustration: A brune figure in winter evening resists Identity… (He sets down the broom and sits next to Cat at table reading the book)

Cat – The thing he carried resists the most necessitous sense. Accept them, then, as secondary. Parts not quite perceived of the obvious whole…

-          Broom stands up and walks over behind Carlos and Cat at the table with the book.

Broom – Secondary, that’s how you bibliophiles see me?! I resent the notion!

Cat – Meow! I don’t believe it! Vive la resistance!

Carlos – Prove your primacy broom, if you would then. How are you a thinking thing? Speak up!

Broom – Ehem, tune in…If nature were master, a broom I would be…But I am not…I am a blue guitar, you having played me…

Carlos – Remarkable!

Cat – But the line goes, “a BRUNE figure in winter evening,” broomstick. ‘Brune’ is French like…Clare Dupray.

Broom – I see. But by your definition, second nature reigns supreme. The all-consuming fiction omni-presides in a fixated fortitude set forth by fate and astral influx, desire and the cosmos, destiny, death, and dust. It’s the perpetual war between the sun and the sea, infinity and one…Do you see?

Carlos – I don’t…..quite see but, the Cat, if I may  vouch, was just saying, you see, because the line goes—

Broom – Broom, brune, broom, bloom, whom, assume as soon until I say Fie! It sounds like BRUME to me, so what’s the difference between two consonants too close to call? Nevertheless and withal, I am what I am to you and I am thus.

Cat – Charming, indeed.

Broom – What was the previous poem you did read?

Cat – (flipping pages) That I recited? I cannot recall…

Broom – Tragic.

Carlos – It’s actually always a comedy.

Broom – How little it would take to turn the poets into the only true comedians! There’s no truer comedy than this hodge-podge of men and sunlight, women and moonlight, houses and clouds, and so on…

Cat – Nor any truer tragedy.
Carlos – Disputable…
Broom – So what do we have over here? (Proceeding to examine the contents on the bookshelf)
Carlos – Ah yes, there are some good titles—
Cat – Whoa, wait. Come on you guys, get over here, we have something here. We have (looks to the book’s spine) Stevens’ Collected Poetry and Prose.
Broom – Point taken. (To Carlos) Come on, you. Proceed, read some more. Inspire. Consider nothing. Respire, aspire, then read anything.
Carlos – Alright, give me a moment, let me think out loud….Ah, I see. It would be like…A poem is a play. Being so, should it be performed first and then read, or should its audience read the script before seeing it performed?
Cat – I would first prefer a performance, so I have no expectations.
Broom – Indeed, agreed. Plus, “Authors are actors, books are theatres”, as the saying goes. And you ain’t no author.

Carlos – Aye, eye. Being so a play in entirety goes from doors’ open to curtain’s close, finely bound upon a line between two twine-woven spines.
Cat – If the curtain were necessary in such a setting.
Carlos – That’s what makes poetry so tough. The playwrights’ genre, beheld onstage, can neither withhold nor rival the density of the poets’. The medium of poesies remains thus curtain-less. Yet, there mustn’t be none of that. An author wills a poem as a reader would a poem, and they always want something else to happen. Neither is happy and they say, “is that it?!” And the desire dissolves into the thinness. Nevertheless, we never feel influenced from Beyonds, herein a given desirous body, wherein if thy body’s utmost desire is satisfied, then ‘tis “not a great desire.” Therefore, I think there isn’t proper sequel unless all poems are inferred equal…Ah, it would seem that plays have…closure, of sorts. They’re not so abstract, yet more abrupt, I think. In poetry there’s always something left to say, and what’s left to say ceases to be...well, said. No! Instead, if I may say, well sai
Broom – A talking cat on the floor is worth two walking out the door…
Cat – If poems are so intellectually frustrating then read us a play.
Broom – Yes! Seconded.
Carlos – I can’t do that.
Broom – Sure you can.
Carlos – It doesn’t work that way. There are multiplied facets of responsibility…I can’t play everybody—
Cat – (to Broom) Bowl is an idealist, you know.
Broom – Aha! Tsk, tsk. I see, but fear not! If it makes it easier we, the Cat and I, could play along...
Carlos – If you’re offering then surely. Shall we?
Cat – (to Broom) I don’t care.
Broom – (to Cat) We shall! (to Carlos) Provided I select it.
Carlos –Nothing would please me more.
Broom – Aye! Let’s see…Carlos amongst the Candles…no…The Bowl, Cat, and the…no…Aha, Three Travelers Watch a Sunrise, this is the one!

Carlos – (leaning over the page) Who do you want to be?
Cat – Let’s each take one of three Chinamen.
Broom – I’ll take the most heralded role!
Cat – Why can’t I play that one?
Broom – Because I’m the typecast.
Carlos – The heralded role, eh, how’s about you take the First Chinese?
Cat – And we could call him…Herald Broom…
Carlos – (there’s a short pause) Brilliant!

Broom – (to Cat) We’ll call you the Second, then, and (to Carlos) you’ll take the Third Chinese.

Carlos – So…how should we begin?

Cat – I will. (reads) “All you need to find poetry—

Broom – No! No! Let’s first ask our self…well, what is a play before the lights hit the stage? Suppose those indeterminate moments before the curtain is drawn, say the darkest moment right before the light of a candle sputters to life, the moments when you don’t know if the play is tragic, comedic, Italian, or French Canadian?

Carlos – Then say the stage is the earth, and our stage lights the sun. The point of difference from reality is this: That is: Illustration: the earth remains of one color, it remains…red, and it remains what it…is. But when the sun shines upon the earth, our stage most true, in reality it does not shine upon a thing that remains what it was yesterday…Then the sun rises, as never before, upon whatever the earth happens to be.

Cat – Imagine those moments when a waxed wick sputtering up finds itself in seclusion, as falling trees in the forest or rustling leaves in an abandoned street, and it shines perhaps for the beauty of shining. It never knew—as one of the poor lights—and it possessed neither love, nor inspiration, nor purpose, nor wisdom. Or could the candle be an eye itself? Besides, it may be said that the invasion of humanity is what counts.

Broom – My Russian friend once said that hyper-consciousness is a serious disease…Imagine three figures on a stage and all of the possible seats’ vistas. If there were three warriors battling for blood or power upon the stage then the audience would forget the stage for the sake of the three figures—the figures stand on it, the foundation functionally fixed—for a certain feeling.

Carlos – And sunrise is multiplied, like the earth on which it shines, by the eyes that open on it.

Cat – So really…Ehem (reads), “All you need to find poetry is to look for it with a lantern.”

All: HA HA HA!! (There a short pause after they’ve indulged in an enthymeme-induced laughter)

Carlos – And when the play ends?

Broom – The invasion of humanity is then secluded. Isolation, silence, solitude, sleep, death, and dreams need no candle in their hermitage. The end of the play is only the end of the play as you know it…

-          (Broom leans in to blow out the candle. Carlos stops him.)

Carlos – Wait! But what if I’m not ready for it to end?

Cat – A play must, but poetry never does. Poetry is labyrinthine. It’s the great ellipsis…

-          (Decidedly, the three simultaneously blow out the candle. The room goes pitch-black.)

Broom – (unseen in the dark) How like him, everyone thought. Then he was gone, and the world was a blank. It was cold and the air was still. Tell me, you people out there, what is poetry anyway? Can anyone die without even a little?
-          (Exeunt)

Friday, November 30, 2012

Uncollected Blog Posts: the last blog before the Last

I haven't posted anything for a few weeks. Early on in our semester I had a lot of thoughts, thoughts I haven't had the time to elaborate upon, thoughts that I cannot flesh out in single paragraphs. But I do feel obligated to give my fellow bloggers and followers a taste of the "Saved Blog" arsenal that I had planned on elaborating upon but didn't get around to because of...I have no good reason for you except that there's no good reason for it. So here's what I have left from "Saved Blogs" which I have not posted:


"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"

I never understood what the phrase mentioned by Stevens via Sexson seen in the Adagia which says "A poem is a pheasant." Poetry is as frustrating as "letting the cat out of the bag," so I'm saying if you see what I speak. The moment you think you've found the words that work perfectly the thought escapes and you lose the words which would've fit. Synthesizing and analyzing your thoughts, being the thoughts of your inner-poet, -daimon, -demons, -monologue, -philosophizer and all, is never quite captured. Thoughts caught in your periphery are that very pheasant, which is why words and their meaning are ever-fleeting and never-exceeding ideas. In paraphrasing Stevens, the eyes sees less than the tongue says and the tongue says less than the mind think.
In poetry I see three qualities in a bird; freshness, cleanliness, and flight capabilities. Why? Because the pheasant is a bird. It's hard to explain clearly and without abstraction of...you know, whatever. It's a poetical thing. Anyways, to Wallace Stevens a pheasant is a metaphor, thus a pheasant is a poem. Poetry, being pretty words placed side-by-side in euphonic phraseology with metrical narrative, is the type of bird that flees into a bush, and it takes you several minutes, days, hours, months, to recover it. And when you do recover it seems to flee the mind all too quickly. The bird is a mythological figure and idea that one seldom sees easily, but if seen as it is if one's objective daimonic self sees it as it is then the desire isn't fully satisfied and will never be and should never be. Although the instinctual beings hunt for the birds' migratory patterns. But what if you did take the time to catch it, then what? Well then, there's nothing left to be done. Task absolved and obsolete, and there's no story left to tell...
Wrong. In other words, the perfect poem is always "just out of reach." Sure it's the thought that counts, but the best part is finding the perfect fit. Fleeting thoughts is forgetfulness. Think of it this way, try expressing the same thought with two different sayings. It's harder than it sounds. Then, after some several moments of time has elapsed and the right words have come to pass, try saying the same thing twice.


"...to be aggregated: The Anatomy of Influence"
(unfortunately there's no aggregation, following are only quotes and words that struck me, also see poems on pages: 169, 196, 264, 319, and 323 because "Men think they are better than grass")

Wordswordswrdswerves:
phantasmagoria, clinamen, agonistic, vista, grass, lilac, palinode, misprision, agon, progeny, ennui, ephebe, palpable, squib, quibble, efficacy, erudite, metaphysics, acedia, pliant, solipsism, cadence, capricious, askesis, apophrades, tessera, apothegm,

Quotes:
"Indeed he writes as though no one, including William Shakespeare, ever has written a play before The Tempest. Without precursors, it fathers itself." -75
"Lucretius's one poetic flaw is his tendentiousness, a quality of overpersuasion he shares with Sigmund Freud." -138
The one time I met Wallace Stevens, he startled me by quoting from memory the stanza beginning "Men scarcely know how beautiful fire is," one of the glories of Shelley's most visionary long poem, "The Witch of Atlas." -189
"More complexly, the Meditation is divided in three: the Dreaming Back, the Return, the Phantasmagoria." -192
"Six traditions say, is a "perfect" number, as is twenty-eight. I am unhappy with perfect numbers but cannot evade them." -194
"All cultural past actually was at the erudite sage's back, but he denies that history existed. There was only biography." -209
"Shakespeare is said by Emerson to have "converted the elements, which waited on his command, into entertainments." -215
"Emerson's lifelong obsession was with a poetry yet to be written, and which never could be written. That carries prospectiveness to the border of madness." -217
"Responding to his own challenge, Stevens achieves his American Sublime beyond irony. His Romantic had failed, but a new Romantic replaces an older one." -254
"The strongest adversary for deep reading is...the extraordinary profusion and speed of information." -255
"but even flaws have greatness..." --261
"Eternity is only an abstraction from the actual present. Infinity is only a great reservoir of recollection, or a reservoir of aspiration: man-made." -265
"As Stevens was to formulate this a decade after Crane's death, the final belief is to believe in a fiction while knowing that what you believe is not true." -281
"Leaves of Grass is an atmosphere, a vision, above all an image of voice and of voicing. Perhaps best of all it is what Whitman called a vista." -286
"...the American Religion, our strange fusion of Gnosticism, Orphism, and Self-Reliance." -293
"To read Whitman aright, we have to remain perpetually intransitive, like the vast majority of his middle-voicing verbs, his verbs of sensation, perception, and cognition." -303
"Poetry is not, cannot be therapy, but in a time when all spirituality is tainted by political exploitation, or by the depraved cultural politics of the academy and the media, a few poets can remind us of the possibility of a more authentic spirituality." -333
"There is no way out of the labyrinth of literary influence once you reach the point where it starts reading you more fully than you can encompass other imaginations. That labyrinth is life itself. I cannot finish this book because I hope to go on reading and seeking the blessing of more life." -335



"I'm losing my eyesight but not any focus"

It runs in the family. On another note, to build upon your poetic ellipsis you must, with each individual creation, create a new and reconfigure your inner-critic. Mostly following are inelaborate blurbs and unanswered questions: What's the difference between sensation, perception, and cognition??? Intuition, Empiricism, Impressionism, Aesthetic, Epiphany/Realization, Memory...
What similar qualities do progression, digression, and regression have??? Retrogression...

"What the Adagia found"


"Authors are actors, books are theatres."
"A new meaning is the equivalent of a new word."
"Weather is a sense of nature. Poetry is a sense."
"It is the belief and not the god that counts."
"Not all objects are equal."
"Sentimentality is a failure of feeling."
"As the reason destroys, the poet must create."
"Money is a kind of poetry."
"The death of one god is the death of all."
"Realism is a corruption of reality."
"When one is young everything is physical; when one is old everything is psychic."
"Reality is a vacuum."
"All men are murderers."
"There must be something of the peasant in every poet."
"The body is the great poem."
"Society is a sea."
"The acquisitions of poetry are fortuitous: trouvailles. (Hence, its disorder)."
"The eye sees less than the tongue says. The tongue says less than the mind thinks."
"Since man made the world, the inevitable god is the beggar."
"The romantic is the first phase of (non-pejorative) lunacy."



"The Bowl, Cat, & Broomstick, & Of Modern Poetry"

Memorable quotes:
 Broomstick: ...man and mountains, women and waves, and so on, are undefined, so the relations of eyes and legs, lips and cheeks, and that kind of thing, are equally undefined. It is all part of the universal comedy, which the poets ignore, because they continue to believe in tragedy.

 See 631-32


Broomstick: A man with so firm a faith in the meaning of words should not listen to poetry.



 Bowl: What a fool I have been!

Cat: What does it say about the portrait? (Broomstick reads) Oh, red, red! Acutely red! Damn all portraits of poets and poetesses!
Broomstick: One should always read a preface first.

One of my personal favorites of Stevens:
Of Modern Poetry:
The poem of the mind in the act of finding
What will suffice. It has not always had
To find: the scene was set; it repeated what 
Was in the script.
                        Then the theatre was changed
To something else. Its past was a souvenir.
It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place.
It has to face the men of the time and to meet 
The women of the time. It has to think about war
And it has to find what will suffice. It has
To construct a new stage. It has to be on that stage, 
And, like an insatiable actor, slowly and
With meditation, speak words that in the ear,
In the delicatest ear of the mind, repeat,
Exactly, that which it wants to hear, at the sound
Of which, an invisible audience listens,
Not to the play, but to itself, expressed
In an emotion as of two people, as of two
Emotions becoming one. The actor is
A metaphysician in the dark, twanging 
An instrument, twanging a wiry string that gives
Sounds passing through sudden rightnesses, wholly
Containing the mind, below which it cannot descend,
Beyond which it has no will to rise.
                                                      It must
Be the finding of a satisfaction, and may
Be of a man skating, a woman dancing, a woman
Combing. The poem of the act of the mind.




Removed from our play's script:


A story itself is proof of its flawed design. Artistic construction will be deconstructed, but its fate is determined before being incepted into critical nature. In [unfallen and critical] nature the whole of composition continually decomposes; as criticism in time becomes creation; or, as art is earth’s lingual core as much as it’s merely a face of earth’s surface; or, as dust is us.
What troubles the poet most is the difference between the act of beginning a composition and their envisioned act of composing. Deciding is desirous and desire is suffering [because all desire, from knowledge to love, is fleeting], but without the fleeting entity of things suffering would be omnipresent and never-leaving. Fortunately it doesn't, suffering and desire are both creations as is anxiety, and because of the fleeting nature of entities the poet has to decide between…the rise and fall, the daemon and the demon, and doing and dreaming….
The thing the poet must understand is the rule of three. For examples, in the tune of trinitarianism:
-          Density – dirt, clouds, sky (Intellectual entities)
-          Physicality – Night, Dawn/Dusk, Light (Natural entities)
-          Psychoanalytically – Daemon, Person, Demon (Personal entities)
-          Demographically – Critical, Content, Creative (Passionate entities)
-          Morally – Good, Moderate, Evil (Philosophical entities)
-          Existentially – Imaginatively, Stoically, Realistically (WHAT?)
-          Material, Divinity, Infinity
-          Rock, Sun, Space
-          Germ, Thinking, Void
-          Allegorically – (Cat, Bowl, Broomstick)
Although all exists in groups of three, paradoxically, all is one, and I’m you and you’ll do what I want to if I do what you want to do because you’re me. But it all depends on the perspective the poet chooses first, given three choices, and how the first decision leads to the second and third levels. The weak poet chooses one side and doesn’t examine the other two; the strong poet examines all three sides from one side’s eyes. The poem, by the end, must move up the three and down through back to a martyred one.
A poem has a longer lasting life than its poet. A poem that’s good enough that is: because once It’s placed precisely [i.e. contextually ironic, consistently on an offbeat, strangely believable, imaginatively, awkwardly romantic, experimentally strong, and most of all morally poor] in a linear continuum the composition exists en abyme, inarticulately, inanimately, imaginatively and amongst other things until naught and abruptly extinct. Composition is a thing and a natural entity. Thereafter, an act of composition that is completed, like a poem, has nothing to do with its composer, like a poet, hereafter. What troubles the poet most is his lack of potency. Without potency a poet hasn’t a pack, a bag of tricks hidden in a book of conspiracies and hopes within a knapsack of schemes being held back by his lacking dreams.
With the correct quirkiness and divine luck of the day, a composition’s mind will make its way off the shelves and germinate others. Primal art’s downfall is its ineffective temporality. 

Lines:


"Carlos - The earthy sheen deflects the moonshine to my eyes, through the dew’s misprision into two pupils, as if I’d examine the sun so blissfully with such an ignorant earthly sheen coating mine own eyes. The saying is true. It is, but I’ve been either overlooking and understating this so-called bliss or losing my thread too quickly and missing out on it altogether…Who could I ask, what do I see; so I can get to where I’m going? The Bible? Hah! No. How about, the book! But first…"

"Carlos – The moon is the blue ocean’s biggest island in the violet abyss. The northern green glitter and aural prisms slice as green serpents in the vaporous night sky abysm."


-          Yeats…page 196, The Anatomy of Influence
o   Every discolouration of the stone, Every accidental crack or dent, Seems a water-course or an avalanche, Or loft slope where it still snows; Though the doubtless plum or cherry-branch; Sweetens the little half-way house; Those Chinamen climb towards, and I; Delight to imagine them seated there; There, on the mountain and the sky, On all the tragic scene they stare. One asks for mournful melodies; Accomplished fingers begin to play. Their eyes mid many wrinkles, their eyes, Their ancient, glittering eyes, are gay. 

          
     Character traits:
-          ---actively participant and willfully ignorant

-          synesthetic themes:
o    ---"The ocean's largest island is the moon"
o    ---ouroboros - self-indulgent serpent, DNA, medicinal symbol, solipsism

The thwarting for desire matters far more than the name and nature of the desire. It was Yeats who wrote: "The desire that is satisfied is not a great desire." -247






"A Conversation:"

A: I can’t tell you what to do or what to say or how to live, but I can ask you to listen. If you can't do that for me then move along, but do remember that you’ll have this conversation again and again with whoever you happen to have it with until the time comes that you’re going to stick with it. Point is, all I’m asking from you is a small portion of your time and, for that time if you choose to accept my offer now, all of your attention.

Z: Why are you asking?

A: I want to tell you a story.

Z: What do you think I’ll learn from this story?

A: I don’t know and don’t want to know unless you know and want to tell me after I’m done.

Z: What makes you think I’ll get it?

A: You don’t have to get it.  You don't have to think so hard. You shouldn't have to because it’s my story.

Z: You conceded solipsist. What if I’m willing and worthy of being a participant?

A: Well imagine I asked you this first, is one bird in both hand is as valuable as two birds in a single bush?

Z: What do you mean?

Thursday, November 29, 2012

More impromptu poems, done and undone


Investigation in the truest form is intuitive estimation—Wherein
Declaratives are inductive follies—By golly!— Appeal to definition—
Fie, how thou art stand!—Which side detective?
Consist resist guestimate or jump ship—Choose either all—Be.
Stand ground. Persist. Live on and prosper…Listen…your sight, it sees.
Everything is and all is a thing. Me
You, the solipsist. the Monarchy; it’s all real and the real is fiction.
Souls are dust and matter masks us.—Appealing to diction—
Therein, beyond, blind eye sees slight directive.
Fakeness lives in the leaves on the lifeless
Street. It’s calm and cold but the coldness weighs
Down, and the first snow falls, the grounds compress
For some odd forever, till winter strays.
Rake-less lives are...

As the fly there who looks upon you all,
'Fore a swat left a leg up on the wall,
The strong bodes fall hardest while the weakest
Stall, still sticking around for breakfast...
Before breathing for the light at the end
Of the hall, where would be new-found a den.
Demesne as addendum and resplendent
As clinamen reroutes the old ground's ten'ment.
Eminent as another door opens
And rem'niscent at best as from a pest
Incarnate to lifelessness whose poor soul lends
It's bode to a state of eternal rest.
Thus if bliss initiates--more or less--
Then consider this poem of lore's int'rest.


Alone in the void bodes a roaming voice
Echoing being, god's imposing choice
Of life or darkness, canonical light
Encroaching lilac anon, call on sight.
It approaches. Images falls shorts of truth
Because a poem itself is flaw of its proof.
Composition is dyslexically
Solved ere vision empirically
Sets forth materia poetica to deduce
From earth into art, aesthetica rooms in use
To fill until one more door manifests,
Which ends too soon so go pre-plan the rest
That, in aggregate, shall perhaps continue
Into a foreign land from One to venue to...


To deduce the ending to ellipsis
Is to remove anxious expectation.
To reduce the story to its thesis
Is to assume poiesis implantation.
Adieu to you, my audience, spellbound
Under the umbrellas incantation,
Merry and betrothed and lost and new-found.
Patriot of, so-called, labyrinth's nation.
Chao, my meandering trespasser whose
Now crossed over, the Uruguatian Styx
Of flowing thickets you choose to peruse, 
The Palate of sol'd thoughts seeming antics.
Which in tiem or no convince a return
Undone, from none, is dusty as an urn.


Diambic Pent-half-meter
Y'all think Im'ma try
To compose some kind
Of lewd diatribe
Shrewd and unkind
Though unnecessary
For medicinal,
Apothecary
Platitude and all
That jazz, musical
As that blue sun, sol
To Spanish tragics
Whose azul-less tricks
Peruse through no use
Till afterwards' truth...